19 comments:
Robert Muir said...
Friends;
As the attached article has verified I do not have a great deal of doubt that the Copenhagen summit on climate change as everything to do with creating a global crisis to bring the world together into a New World Order.
But the question still remains ambiguous as to who is going to rule the NWO.
I was somewhat taken back when Prince Charles showed up at the forum and was given the spotlight in a speech where he spoke relative to climate change. I was even more surprised when he had said just today that is something is not done within seven years the planet as we know it is going to undergo catastrophic changes.
There is talk of a treaty, and now Prince Charles has said the magical words – seven years. Where does Charles get this notion of seven years from; that’s the question?
I do not want to jump to any drastic conclusions; nevertheless, even though at the time my writing there has been no deal reached relating to any deal or treaty; that is not to say that if a seven year treaty were to be agreed upon and then confirmed by Prince Charles as a result of this summit wouldn’t that give scholars more than enough substance to label him as the leader of the NWO according to the Bible prophecies of Daniel Chapter 9, Verse 27?
A full test of Charles’s speech is to be found at the following link:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/15/prince-charles-speech-copenhagen-climate
Even though I have been called paranoid at this blog for even making the suggestion; but there may have been some sustenance in what I said when I thought there was something definitely out of the ordinary in the royal family making a special request for privacy away from the prying eyes of the paparazzi this Christmas? But let us just wait and see how this eventually turns out? Any other postive suggestions would be appreciated
15 December 2009 23:20
Robert Muir said...
May I further add to the above article that even though the evidence may sometimes appear to be overwhelming and may well seem to point so obviously in a certain direction, I do not believe necessarily that Prince Charles is the Beast of Revelation, so I am not saying that at all?
Consider how Satan is much more clever and cunning than any man and he lays traps and snares all along the road to the fulfilment of the truth.
Remember he can also read the Bible, and can also read what Christians are writing in books and on the Internet. Accordingly, when he reads that Christians are looking for a seven year treaty to corroborate the identity of the Antichrist he may just provide one just to throw everyone off the path? There have been numerous books written that have been trying to say that Charles was the Beast; Satan can read those books to!
Therefore, even if Prince Charles were to confirm some form of a seven year treaty as a result of the Copenhagen Summit that act alone is not enough evidence to label him as being the Antichrist. There has to be more, a lot more than that, before we can put the Antichrist label onto anyone.
It hasn’t happened anyway, there has not been a seven year treaty so therefore please understand that what most of what I have written above is based on nothing more than pure speculation at this stage. Your friend
16 December 2009 01:14
Dawn said...
Thanks Bob for posting this. I was wondering where you got this info from? Is there a website where they have posted the document talked about, or a video of some of the talks from Copenhagen? I have friends who I would love to share this, but unless it's an official document of some sort, or video, they will find this very hard to believe. Funny, the UN has been toying around with this genocide idea for some time now, but have finally found a way to make it palatable for the general public that are just sheep following whoever will appear to save them.
16 December 2009 20:47
vicki said...
Dear Bob, I am sorry to use your page for a prayer request but I believe there is power in prayer and the more people that may read this will pray for my dear cousin Cynthia, she is having a spiritual battle of the flesh, in the way of harming herself, To date this would be three times since the birth of her son a year ago, at present she is in a hospital and my under standing is that they are giving her medication, She is married and has two little boys. Please forgive me,but I do ask that your readers will pray for her and we can claim Victory in Jesus name
16 December 2009 21:49
Bob Mitchell said...
Dear Vicki,
When one part of the body is in need the other parts should come together to help.
We pray for you and your cousin and all the family that this will be placed before the throne of grace and the Lord will speedily answer. In Jesus Name....AMEN
17 December 2009 05:13
Robert Muir said...
Bob:
How can a few laws and taxes here and there going to stop Global Warming and reduce the world’s population by 5 to 6 billion? Who is ever going to swallow the argument that overpopulation is responsible for Global Warming? The average person in the street knows that Global warming is nothing but a scam - so how are they ever going to force everything to swallow the arguments presented here on population reduction?
Are the majority of men really all that bad that they would wish to exterminate billions and billions of souls off the face of the planet? A global police force would have very little or no effect at all.
I would have thought there had been thousands and thousands protesting the Copenhagen summit but because they wanted to see a positive outcome achieved at this summit by the richer nations to help the poorer nations, I can’t seen anything else more than that implicated?
Sure the elitists they are trying to set up a global government and to be certain they want to reduce the world’s population to meet their own selfish agenda - but there has to be more a lot in involved in that surely?
To be certain Hitler’s atrocities were horrifying but when we speak of Hitler we only speak of a single nation, Germany.
Summarising:
Scenario # (1)
I see the Bible prophecies being fulfilled in my lifetime, and a very evil man the Bible calls the Beast come forward and force everything to do his bidding through microchip implant under the skin. Even though I still believe that he may be in power it may yet be still a few years before he chooses to come to the forefront and makes himself a public figure?
Scenario # (2)
The treaty of Daniel may already have been signed (or will be signed shortly.) There will also be a treaty signed at the Copenhagen summit, but not all nations will agree to it. The world will be divided because of its inability to come together as the global elitists would like it to do to and form a New World Order. The Antichrist will instigate a cataclysmic Third World War to bring the world to its knees and from these ashes he will rise to claim global dominance under a NWO – that could be in the immediate future?
17 December 2009 05:24
Robert said...
I would say amen to that request also.
17 December 2009 05:26
Anonymous said...
Hello
Whats happened to Tony Cox and the article he offered to show us? I do hope Bob M is in contact with him, as he had some really interesting points to make! I am just sorry I dont have anything to add. JanD
17 December 2009 11:37
Anonymous said...
Regarding Dawns enquiry
Bob It must be tempting, but I really think you should beware of passing on the OTT scaremongering of the conspiracy theorists.
Found this on unreliable odd ball site. Be careful of virus’s following links.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread526903/pg1
ATS News Above Top Secret with Johnny Anonymous
"The official British two-pronged policy for the Copenhagen Conference is now out‚ in explicit language. It consists of: 1) massive population genocide‚ on a scale that would make Adolf Hitler blush‚ "
Found this odd ball link as well. I think the language used is deliberately emotive. Reader beware read ‘control’ for ‘genocide’. Seems to come from the Chinese idea of having only one child per couple – if this meant abortion, then yes it would be genocide, but not quite as is being portrayed on the ‘odd’ sites like.
Prison Planet
http://www.prisonplanet.com/copenhagen-global-population-control-program-suggested-to-stop-climate-change.html
Bob if you do have a more valid link to your worrying article, I do hope you will post it.
traker
17 December 2009 14:55
Robert Muir said...
I may be wrong but at the time of this writing there does not seem to be any real outcome that is going to be achieved at the Copenhagen Summit, nothing, zilch?
However, I am not disputing the information contained in the context of the attached article it is more than likely correct?
The Copenhagen Summit did seem the have everything to do with the mass extermination of the world’s population while instigating a World Government along the way.
Nevertheless they have not been successful. Though if they had accomplished something and the whole world signed had any sort of an agreement that would have flied directly in the face of Bible prophecy which says there will never ever be a New World Order (an American idea.)
We are told quite clearly that the Final World Empire will be the EU headed by the Antichrist who takes control of only one fourth of the world only. See Revelation Chapter 6, also see Alan Franklin’s book of the same title – EU Final World Empire.
It is simply been nothing more than a shot in the dark that has not paid off and left those behind it with egg splattered all over their faces.
Bilderberger Hilary Clinton has come forth with her billion(s) dollar bribe and while the French president Nicolas Sarkozy spoke out about Global Warming while masses of snow where being dumped on France at the same time.
How ironical is that when even at the venue itself it the weather conditions were less than favorable for a summit on Global Warming? Those adverse weather conditions could have been nothing more than an act of God as they certainly would not have inspired anyone at that summit to reach a deal on climate change.
The former Australian Prime Minister John Howard has come forth and said that any changes to the environment would have to be technologically taken forward. He’s right about that in more ways than what he could ever imagine.
The ball is now back into the courts of the Antichrist. Keep an eye on the daily news broadcasts as the rhetoric possibly heats up towards a catastrophic nuclear war.
A little while ago it was Saddam Hussein, but now that he is out of the picture keep on eye on Iran and North Korea now they seem to have been hyped up to being the world’s boogey men at the moment.
This is not mean to be scaremongering, but the Illuminati constantly has the world in a state of preparedness for their forthcoming third world war which they could ignite at any time.
Bible prophecy now appears to back into perspective?
17 December 2009 17:25
Robert Muir said...
The following comments now rescind the previous remarks whereby I had said that there had been no positive outcome as a result of the Copenhagen Climate Summit. I would also like to withdraw previous comments whereby I had said that even if a seven year plan were presented at the Copenhagen Summit it would not be the treaty of Daniel Chapter 9 verse 27. I may have been wrong in both cases?
And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make [it] desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. Daniel Chapter 9 verse 27
Lead by the French president Nicholas Sarkozy there is news that is beginning to emerge out of the Copenhagen Summit that a certain group of world leaders had been meeting in the very small hours of the evening Copenhagen time, and have now come up with a draft resolution for some form of a pact that is to be presented to the delegates by 12 noon Copenhagen time.
As yet, I do not have any details of what is going to be in the treaty but I would not be surprised if terminology such as seven years were mentioned. I make reference to seven years because that is what we are told in the aforementioned prophecy of Dan: 9, 27 is going to be the time span for the finish of things and the end of time.
If the Copenhagen Summit does turn out to be the treaty of Daniel then the information contained in the attached is correct and the Antichrist is headed down the pathway for the total genocide of mankind.
Remember, I had also mentioned that I thought the newly appointed EU Secretary General could be the Antichrist and that Nicholas Sarkozy could be his False Prophet acting on his behalf. Without further information I still cannot say that undeniably this will be the case in point?
Nonetheless, we need to bear in mind that the EU Secretary General was appointed to his position on the 01st of December 2009 and that the first horsemen of the apocalypse tells us that he (meaning the Antichrist) is given a crown and then rides out like a conqueror set on conquest. That means that shortly after being appointed as the head of the EU he confirms the seven year covenant of Daniel Chapter 9, Verse 27.
And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer. Revelation Chapter 6, Verse 2
There are some that had said that “the many” referred to in Daniel made reference to Israel and the Arab states in the area. While there were yet others who believed “the many” in the prophecy referred to the whole world. In light of recent events I am now beginning to think the second correlation was the more correct of the two. Let us now wait on the Lord and see how this eventually pans out. Your friend
18 December 2009 01:20
Bob Mitchell said...
Dear friends, thanks to anonymous' contribution above, I shall remove this post within the next 12 hours. It was a wise comment that I should be able to back up what I am sent.
Apologies for putting up what may be simply scaremongering and conspiracy nonsense without any backing.
18 December 2009 03:50
Anonymous said...
Hiya Bob
Found this via Rapture Ready – Very interesting – wadya think?
Salbuchi - 2010 Forecast: Transition from Globalization to World Government 1 of 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ktQSLgu4n4&feature=player_embedded#
E.I.
18 December 2009 12:29
Anonymous said...
Hi again Bob
Found this transcribe taken from the You Tube link I sent, it's from a poster on RR. It makes it clearer by seeing the list in writing, also the opinion of the poster.
"After seeing all three, it looks like this man (an Argentinian economist and trend predictor, kind of like American Peter Schiff)) is going at it from a secular perspective.
He doesn't strike me as a "nut" - he goes to great lengths at the beginning to say he's like a weatherman and making predictions based on the world "weather".
But.....everything he says - and I mean EVERYTHING - just follows scripture and the trib down to the detail!
He's talking about how the past 20 yrs. has been all about "Globalisation", but now the focus is on a One World Order. He says it's been in the planning for decades (we already knew that).
Here are the events he predicts will happen in the very near future (2010-2011)"
1) A Financial collapse will lead to a global currency
2) A world Economic collapse will occur, leading to a OWG which will "discipline" people into obeying.
3) Social Upheaval/ Civil War in the U.S. and/or the E.U. The goal of this is to "militarize" society and implement matial law - for even more control of the populace.
4) Pandemics along with mandatory vaccines and RFID chipping. Also aimed at enforcement, as well as depopulation
5) Focus on environment / global warming to justify a OWG to manage it all.
6) Terrorism - expect a "mega attack" with Weapons of Mass Destruction (nuclear or chemical) in either the U.S. or E.U.
7) A big war in the Middle East. Israel attacks Iran, Russia backs Iran, Iran retaliates. A "mega-war" (Can anyone say Gog-Magog?)
8) A Nuclear "accident" where a small city is devastated. Would show no nation could safely manage their resources, so control would require global control.
9) The assasination of a "Key" public figure in the western world - either political or religious.
10) Rogue countries would be "beaten up" for not cooperating - would set an example so others would fall in line.
11) Psych-ops - a "staged" religious "Second Coming". A "new age" rationale. Possibly staged electronically. Could lead to re-bulding of the Jewish temple.
12) A staged landing or view or communication with Aliens/extra-terrestrials. This would pull people together and support a OWG to represent us to alien life. He says Hollywood has been preparing us.
E.I.
18 December 2009 13:09
Bob Mitchell said...
I shall delete this post after the weekend and place all the comments on the "Justice for Duke" post.
18 December 2009 14:19
Robert Muir said...
Hi there Bob
How’s the weather over there is Sussex I have heard you were experiencing a terrible snow storm and everything is bogged down; for your sake let’s hope everything improves.
You’re latest posting relating to the Copenhagen Climate Summit was so unlike your usual constructive manner that I was quite surprised when you had put it up. It was a little bit over the top!
You must have received quite a few e-mails complaining about the scaremongering factor associated with the article. As there are simply too many Christians who simply cannot stand the thought of being taken out of their comfort zones and being placed into a less pleasurable situation it may be best if you delete it as you said you were going to. It is always best not to frighten fellow believers unless one really has to.
Some form of a treaty has been proposed after the completion of the Copenhagen Summit but there will be no real evidence until the end of 2010 when it is officially signed off that it could be the treaty of Daniel Chapter 9, Verse 27. Wait until then to see if it is!
In the meantime, a meeting will be hosted by the French president in about June of next year to push any submission to the fore that was brought forward at the summit. Remember both the newly appointed EU Secretary General and Sarkozy are French.
I have noticed not just here, but right around the Internet, that if one Christian does not necessarily agree with what another has to say the first thing they do is to point the finger accusing them of being a False Prophet, and that before finding out the facts of the matter.
However, as viewpoints sometimes may depend on various factors, more often than not this is not correct. At the end of the day it is best to rely on the word of God and not what another Born again believer has to say relative to any matter and in that way we cannot go wrong.
Always test anything that some one else says against the word of God.
TO E.I: I have had a look at the DVD as you suggested the man is good; however there is no evidence whatsoever to suggest this man is a Christian so be very, very careful.
19 December 2009 01:17
Anonymous said...
Hello Robert Muir
Thank you for responding. While the post is obviously open to review by all, I was actually addressing blog owner BOB Mitchell for his considered opinion.
Nothing has been said about this man being a Christian, in my post it clearly says he is an analyst and it is just interesting how his views are similar to end time prophecy – that’s all.
If you re-read this part of my post it should allay your fears?
"After seeing all three, it looks like this man (an Argentinian ECONOMIST and TREND PREDICTOR, kind of like American Peter Schiff)) is going at it from a SECULAR perspective.
He doesn't strike me as a "nut" - he goes to great lengths at the beginning to say he's like a weatherman and making predictions based on the world "weather".
But.....everything he says - and I mean EVERYTHING - just follows scripture and the trib down to the detail! “
E.I.
19 December 2009 04:53
Robert Muir said...
There has been two names mentioned here, Chuck Missler and the Rapture Ready website, both are U.S. based.
I don’t know a great deal about Mr. Missler but from what I have seen he appears to be a nice enough sort of a fellow. CM is quite a well known and respected preacher on end time’s subjects and I would imagine he has become quite wealthy through the sale of his books, DVD’s etc?
I have had dealings with the Rapture Ready website and that experience was not very pleasant. Chuck Missler is a staunch believer in the pre-tribulation theory of the Rapture as are the folk at Rapture Ready.
While Chuck Missler quite candidly admits he is frequently wrong about certain events and doesn’t mind saying so - the writers at RR are so heavily indoctrinated into their pre-tribulation theory beliefs that if anyone were dare to suggest anything contrary to their opinions they defend stance as if their life depended on it.
It’s more like an obsession and a business than true Christianity and they are more than capable of becoming quite nasty and underhanded to anyone who dares opposes their doctrine. They do not disclose their financial situation but I would also imagine RR would also have done quite nicely out of the pre-tribulation scam, and that’s what it is a scam?
As events propel the world at a lightning rate towards the end times CM has now very openly come out and said his theories relating to the timing of the Rapture may be out somewhat, and so in that respect he is honest, but not so with RR.
The point of all this is that there are some doubts in my own mind as to what really lays behind the thinking of those involved with the pre-tribulation theory of the Rapture, and are the majority just using Christianity and the pre-tribulation theory to suit their own motives? I am beginning to believe that may be the case. Whether or not they know it - those that believe the pre-tribulation theory has allowed the Antichrist to arise.
This view is going to upset a lot of people but that cannot be helped.
19 December 2009 05:18
Anonymous said...
Bob (Mitchell)Just wanted to say how much I respect your willingness to admit a mistake and to correct it (pending)Your actions are an example to all. Especially the following poster who was at first in agreement with you before suddenly doing a U turn.
Quoting one particular poster.
“However, I am NOT DISPUTING the information contained in the context of the attached article it is MORE THAN LIKELY CORRECT?
The Copenhagen Summit DID SEEM TO HAVE EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THE MASS EXTERMINATION OF THE WORLD’S POPULATIONdid while instigating a World Government along the way.”
17th December 2009 @ 17.25.
Still quoting the same poster as two days later he retraces his steps after you admitted a lapse of judgment.
“You’re latest posting relating to the Copenhagen Climate Summit was so unlike your usual constructive manner that I was quite surprised when you had put it up. It was a little bit OVER THE TOP!"
However, as viewpoints sometimes may depend on various factors, more often than not this is NOT CORRECT. !!!!!
19 December 2009 01:17
A fast reversal of opinion while rubbing your nose into your already admitted lapse of judgment. Don’t let it get to ya; it put my back up to see this but I expect you’re made of sterner stuff. Good for you Bob M.
